Tuesday, April 20, 2010
It's as clear as rule 10b-5 why Goldman (GS) will have a hard time defending itself - the violation is unmistakable, Barry Ritholtz says. The SEC's two Goldman "suck-ups" who voted against bringing the case are "unqualified and incompetent," he says in calling for their resignation.
It's as clear as rule 10b-5 why Goldman (GS) will have a hard time defending itself - the violation is unmistakable, Barry Ritholtz says. The SEC's two Goldman "suck-ups" who voted against bringing the case are "unqualified and incompetent," he says in calling for their resignation.: "It's as clear as rule 10b-5 why Goldman (GS) will have a hard time defending itself - the violation is unmistakable, Barry Ritholtz says. The SEC's two Goldman 'suck-ups' who voted against bringing the case are 'unqualified and incompetent,' he says in calling for their resignation. 3 comments!"